Kaspersky vs Avast: Which One Is Better?
People can be very indecisive when it comes to choosing the best antivirus software. Knowing that there is a plethora of more or less similar products on the market, it may be challenging to find a small detail that will prevail upon your decision.
There has always been a controversy about whether Kaspersky is better than other products, especially Avast. Both programs are widely used, they share almost the same features, as well as the pricing plans.
However, some things we’re about to mention may be crucial for choosing the winner.
What to Look for in an Antivirus Software?
The most vital aspect you should focus on when searching for ideal antivirus software is its ability to protect you from the most advanced online threats. Still, that’s not all.
Users tend to prefer the programs that come with a broad set of features and a variety of packages that can be chosen. The truth is that most vendors do their best to provide as many options as they can, including a free plan that consumers especially appreciate.
You should also look for apps that are user-friendly and don’t require a considerable amount of RAM to run; otherwise, your system performance will be considerably affected.
We’ll use all the mentioned factors to compare Kaspersky and Avast. Let’s start.
Avast vs Kaspersky: Which One Offers More Features?
Both Avast and Kaspersky offer the plans suitable for home and business users, as well as the protection for endpoints and mobile devices. You can find a free version at both vendors, as well as the plans that support Windows, macOS, iOS and Android.
This article will be focused on antivirus for home users.
Kaspersky Anti-Virus ($23.99/3PCs/year) is the simplest package, and it provides basic security features. Still, it has proven its efficiency in blocking the latest viruses, ransomware, crypto lockers and other types of advanced threats. It also includes the following features:
- Real-time antivirus protection
- Crypto malware prevention
- Cryptocurrency mining malware blocking
- Enterprise-level protection
Kaspersky Internet Security ($31.99/3 devices/year) is a bit enhanced version, which is suitable for multiple platforms – PC, Mac and Android. Apart from advanced security features, this package also includes the following:
- Online tracking prevention
- Android device spyware detection
- High-level payment encryption
- Unauthorized webcam access prevention
- Limited VPN
The most advanced home plan provided by this vendor is Kaspersky Total Security ($39.99/5 devices/year). It is a full-package plan that is convenient for families that want to make sure their kids are safe while surfing the Internet. In addition to advanced parental controls, Kaspersky Total Security offers the following advantages:
- Bank-grade encryption
- Webcam protection
The plans provided by Avast are also quite comprehensive and varied. Namely, this vendor will allow you to choose between the following premium packages:
- Avast Premium Security (Single-Device and Multi-Device)
- Ultimate Security
If you have only one device to protect, then Premium Security, Single-Device ($69.99) is the right choice for you. The subscription includes one device, regardless of the platform, and it will protect you from a variety of advanced threats such as ransomware and phishing.
Premium Security, Multi-Device ($89.99), on the other hand, can protect up to 10 devices with a single license. Both plans share the same features, which are:
- Ransomware shield
- Web shield
- Webcam shield
- Wi-Fi inspector
- Data shredder
If you’re looking for a more comprehensive plan that includes a broad set of safety features, consider Avast Ultimate Security ($99.99). It’s created to protect multiple devices from malware, ransomware, and other kinds of cyber-attacks frequently used to jeopardize a user’s system.
You can take advantage of the following benefits:
- Password manager
- Cleanup premium
- And more.
After we’ve listed the plans offered by both Avast and Kaspersky, we can see that both vendors provide more or less similar programs. However, we choose Kaspersky as a winner of this section.
Although the difference between the plans is insignificant, Kaspersky still covers more devices than Avast – that may be more convenient for most users, which is why we’ve given the preference to it.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:
- Bitdefender vs. Avast: The Ultimate Comparison Guide
- How to Protect Your Server: The 7 Best Server Antivirus Solutions
- 5 Top-Rated Free Antivirus Software for Home Users
- 7 Essential Antivirus for Mac
- Does iPhone Need an Antivirus?
- Ultimate Guide to the Best Antivirus for Android Smartphones and Tablets
- All You Need to Know about the Internet of Things (IoT)
- 10 Most Common Cyberattacks Throughout the History
Kaspersky vs Avast: MacOS
Devices that run on macOS require a bit different software than those on Windows – luckily, both Kaspersky and Avast have developed the versions of antivirus that can protect Mac as well.
Kaspersky Internet Security for Mac ($23.99/1 device/year) will protect your Mac from the most advanced types of threats and online attacks. It’s easy to set up and use, and apart from a broad range of security features it offers, you can expect to see the following options as well:
- Advanced protection against hackers
- Secured privacy and personal information
- Protection from theft while shopping and paying online
Still, if you have more than one device to protect, choosing Kaspersky Internet Security or Kaspersky Total Security will be a more cost-effective option for you. They work on Windows, Mac and mobile, and provide better value for money than a plan that’s created for Mac only.
Still, you won’t get wrong even if you choose Mac Internet Security.
Apart from Avast Premium Security for Mac, which will cost you $47.99 a year, Avast will generously offer you a free version of Mac antivirus, as well.
A free version is a bit limited, as you can see. Still, it provides decent security options, and it can protect your Mac from different malicious software and phishing attacks quite successfully.
If you want to experience the power of advanced security features, you can try Avast Premium Security for Mac. It provides not only essential real-time protection but also a broad range of tools that keep you safe from online threats, ransomware, and Wi-Fi intrusions.
Additional features you can expect are:
- Wi-Fi security scan
- Web and email shields
- Comprehensive malware protection
You can opt for Premium Security, Multi-Device, since it can protect your Mac as well.
We can conclude that both vendors have their strengths. Kaspersky’s features are robust and varied, while Avast provides a free version, which can be convenient for the users who aren’t ready to buy.
However, if we had to choose the winner of this category, that would be Kaspersky. Even if you want a Total Security plan, which includes all the possible options, you will pay less than you’d pay for Avast.
Kaspersky Free vs Avast Free
We have already mentioned that a free version is available at both vendors. That’s a great convenience since users appreciate high-quality software at no cost, which is beneficial for both parties.
Kaspersky Security Cloud Free provides full-scale malware protection and advanced features that are in line with some suite-level packages. Apart from being quite efficient, it’s entirely free; besides, the fact that’s cloud-based means that it won’t affect your device’s memory.
Other available options are:
- Malicious URL-blocking
- Support for Android and iOS
- Ultimate phishing protection
However, you should know that some features are limited.
Avast has also proven its generosity when it comes to offering packages at no cost. Avast Free Antivirus consists of all of the options that are critical for malware detection, prevention and blocking, which makes it a convenient choice for home users.
It provides slightly more features than Kaspersky, even though Kaspersky is considered almost full-package. Another characteristics you may find useful are:
- Network security inspector
- Password manager
- Malicious URL detection
We can agree that both free versions are quite comprehensive despite their existing limitations. Accordingly, we can say that the score is tied in this category!
Kaspersky versus Avast: Malware Protection
The field where antivirus software needs to prove its effectiveness is malware protection. All the features and packages may be meaningless if a particular antivirus software fails to accomplish its primary mission – to protect a user’s device from online threats and viruses.
To determine which of the antivirus programs is better, we have gone through the results obtained by AV-Comparatives. The following data will show how each of the programs responded to malware and whether they blocked it with success.
The Malware Protection Test was conducted in October 2019. Infected files were already on the disk, and the goal of tested antivirus programs was to show their ability to handle those files and to protect the system before, during, and after execution.
There were 10.556 malware samples used during the test, and they were clustered in order to provide a more representative test-set. Since most of the tested programs were cloud-based, the detection rate was based on both online and offline activity.
You can see that Avast Free Antivirus scored remarkable results in malware detection and prevention, both online and offline. It blocked all 10.556 online malware samples successfully, which is outstanding.
Kaspersky Internet Security has also delivered decent outcomes, but it still failed to block some threats. Unlike Avast, it protected the system from 10.547 malware clusters, which is excellent, but not the best.
However, when we see the last column, False Alarms, we see a significant difference between Avast and Kaspersky. Namely, Avast detected even 7 false positives, while Kaspersky didn’t score one. Accordingly, we can say that Kaspersky turned out to be better there.
False positives usually affect the user experience, making the users thing that the program is not reliable. Besides, indicating that each file can be infectious (even the harmless ones), may be quite annoying.
According to these results, we can say that Avast is the winner. Although it has given a significant number of false positives, it protected the system entirely, unlike Kaspersky. We share our opinion with AV-Comparatives, who awarded Avast an ADVANCED+, and Kaspersky an ADVANCED certificate.
Which One Has Less Impact on System Performance: Kaspersky or Avast?
It may be challenging to complete your everyday tasks when antivirus software you’re using is affecting your system performance, speed and functionality. Consequently, you should find the software that doesn’t require a lot of energy from your device in order to run properly.
However, antivirus is not always responsible for slow system performance. If your device is older, with an insufficient amount of RAM, CPU and disk space, the antivirus can only worsen the overall functionality. In that case, make sure you’re using cloud-based solutions that don’t require much space or consider replacing the outdated hardware, if possible.
AV-Comparatives also conducted the Performance Test. Its goal was to determine whether antivirus that was running in the background affected the activities such as file copying, archiving and unarchiving, installing and uninstalling the apps, launching programs, downloading files and browsing the web.
The ranking system was determined according to the following terms:
The test was performed on a computer with an Intel Core i7-8550U processor with 8GB of RAM and SSD drive. The obtained results are the following:
Both programs have delivered remarkable outcomes, which means that neither of them has affected the system performance, even during the usual computer activities. The only difference we can see is that Avast slightly impacted the system during the application launching, but only the first time it ran – so, it’s not a big deal.
Kaspersky left no trace while the activities were performed, which is also excellent. Therefore, we can say that the score is tied here and that you probably won’t have problems no matter which program you choose.
Kaspersky vs Avast: User-Friendliness
The simple and intuitive user interface is another factor you should consider when choosing the right software. That way, you can spend less time figuring out where to click and focus more on your work or any activity you usually do on your desktop or computer.
Let’s see what Kaspersky offers:
This is a quite clear, intuitive and simple platform that can be suitable for every user. You can scan the entire system with one click and easily access any directory. Users have expressed their satisfaction with the product, mainly because they’ve found its interface quite approachable and straightforward.
Avast provides a similar interface. It’s intuitive, easy-to-use and you won’t have problems finding options that you need. Everything is created so that you don’t need to roam around the app, which makes the antivirus convenient even for the users who don’t have much experience with tech stuff.
Accordingly, the score is tied again – both platforms deserve to be praised since developers have done a great job indeed.
Avast vs Kaspersky: Pricing
You shouldn’t forget about how vital the pricing is – you should always look for a product that provides better value for money, which means that it should deliver high-quality functions at a reasonable price.
If we compare the plans provided by Kaspersky and Avast, we can see a significant difference. Namely, the most expensive package you can find at Kaspersky costs $59.99 a year and covers even 10 devices. On the other hand, Avast Premium Security, Single Device will cost you $69.99, and you can protect only one device.
Accordingly, the winner in the pricing category is Kaspersky!
Verdict: Avast or Kaspersky?
According to the results of our detailed research, the winner is Kaspersky. Still, that doesn’t mean that Avast doesn’t have the strengths that could beat some features you may find in Kaspersky.
Not all users will think that Kaspersky is better than Avast or vice-versa. Still, the opinion will depend on a consumer’s needs, purposes and expectations – have that in mind whenever you’re reading different reviews.